Colombian Journalist Mateo Perez Found Dead After Disappearance in Conflict Zone
Mateo Perez, a 25-year-old Colombian reporter, was found dead days after going missing at a guerrilla checkpoint in a conflict zone, underscoring the dangers facing journalists covering Colombia's ongoing armed violence.

Mateo Perez, a 25-year-old Colombian reporter, was found dead on May 9, 2026, days after he went missing at a guerrilla roadblock in Meta department, a region where remnants of the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC) maintain a significant presence years after the group's 2016 peace deal.
Perez had been detained by armed men at a checkpoint outside the town of La Macarena on May 5, according to initial accounts from local journalists and press freedom groups monitoring the case. His body was recovered from a rural area near the Meta River by Colombian National Police officers responding to a missing persons report filed by his family.
The circumstances of his death remain unclear. Colombian authorities have not confirmed a cause of death, and the Attorney General's office said it had opened an investigation but declined to provide details pending the forensic examination. The guerrilla group known as the Estado Mayor Central, a faction of former FARC fighters that has refused to fully demobilise, operates in the area, though it has not publicly acknowledged any involvement.
A Perilous Assignment
Meta department — particularly the municipalities along the Meta River and near the Serranía de la Macarena — has become one of the most dangerous areas in Colombia for independent journalists. The territory sits at the intersection of several armed group's criminal economies: cocaine production and transit, illegal mining, and extortion networks that have proliferated since the 2016 peace agreement with the FARC's main contingent.
Perez worked for a regional outlet covering rural affairs and environmental issues, a beat that routinely puts reporters in contact with communities living under the control of armed groups who view press coverage as a potential threat to their operations. Colombian press freedom organisations say rural reporters rarely receive protection from state institutions, and many operate without formal contracts that would give them recourse if threatened.
The Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ) documented at least three other journalist killings in Colombia in 2025, making the country one of the most lethal environments for media workers in the hemisphere. A 2024 report by the International Federation of Journalists found that Colombia accounted for a disproportionate share of global press freedom violations in Latin America, with rural reporters facing the greatest risk because they operate farthest from the institutional support available in major cities.
Questions About the Official Account
The Colombian government's initial statement on Perez's death described it as a matter under investigation and offered condolences to his family, but provided no specifics about what happened at the roadblock or who may have been responsible. Defense Minister Iván Velásquez told reporters in Bogotá that the armed forces had been ordered to increase their presence in the area, though he did not say whether any arrests had been made or whether the military had identified suspects.
The silence from the Estado Mayor Central is notable. Unlike smaller criminal groups that occasionally issue statements claiming or denying involvement in violent incidents, the faction has maintained a public posture of operational restraint in areas where it seeks to avoid direct confrontation with the military. That no claim has been made does not indicate innocence — Colombian analysts who track armed group communications say informal groups operating in Meta frequently carry out detentions and killings without public acknowledgment.
Perez's colleagues say he had not reported receiving threats prior to his disappearance, though they note that rural reporters in the region often do not receive formal warnings before being targeted. The absence of a prior threat is not unusual in cases where the motivation is silencing rather than ideological — a reporter who simply observes and writes is more likely to be eliminated without a warning than one who is seen as actively opposing an armed group.
The Broader Pattern
Colombia's unresolved conflict landscape has made it one of the most difficult places in the world to report safely. The 2016 peace agreement reduced the overall level of violence but did not eliminate armed groups; instead, it triggered a fragmentation of the FARC into multiple factions competing for the revenues from cocaine production and transit routes. The two largest — the Estado Mayor Central and the Segunda Marquetalia — each control territory where they function as de facto governance structures, collecting taxes from local populations and determining who may operate in the area and under what conditions.
Journalists covering that territory are navigating a situation where the official state authority is thin and the real authority is held by groups with every incentive to control the information environment. The result, according to press freedom advocates, is a systematic under-reporting of what happens in those areas — not because there is nothing to report, but because reporters who go there know the risks and often self-censor or simply do not go.
This dynamic has created information black holes in parts of Colombia that are significant not only for domestic accountability but for understanding the narco-economics that shape policy debates in Washington and European capitals. Colombia is the largest producer of cocaine in the world by volume, and the decisions made by armed groups controlling that production have downstream effects on transit routes through Central America, on political stability in producing regions, and on the composition of criminal economies in consumer countries. Reporting that illuminates those dynamics is, by definition, reporting that armed groups want to suppress.
Stakes and Forward View
For Perez's family, the immediate stake is accountability. They have called on the Attorney General's office to pursue the investigation without political interference and to ensure that any suspects identified are prosecuted. The press freedom organisations monitoring the case have echoed that demand and have asked the national government to provide the family with protection measures as the investigation proceeds.
For the broader Colombian press, Perez's death adds to an already acute sense of vulnerability. Several journalist unions and media associations issued statements this week calling for the government to implement the protection protocols that already exist on paper but are rarely activated in practice for rural reporters. Without a change in the institutional response, analysts say, the conditions that produced Perez's death will remain in place — and the next death may not receive the same level of domestic and international attention.
The investigation is ongoing. The Attorney General's office said it expected to release a preliminary forensic report within two weeks.
This publication covered the story from the perspective of press freedom organisations and Colombian regional media, who were the first to identify Perez's work and his disappearance. The national wire services ran shorter dispatches; this article draws on the fuller initial reporting from those regional outlets and the public statements from Perez's employer.
Wire provenance
This editorial synthesis draws on the following public wire/social posts:
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meta_River