When Delhi Met Rome: The Cultural Diplomacy Reshaping India–Europe Ties
On 20 May 2026, two of the world's most consequential conservative leaders published a joint article arguing that culture — not merely commerce — should be the backbone of India–Italy relations. India's Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Italy's Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni wrote in The Indian Express that their two nations are "bound by the power of culture and a shared vision" as they look to the future together.
The op-ed is notable less for its diplomatic warmth — such language is standard in joint communiqués — than for what it signals structurally. India is diversifying its European partnerships at a moment when the continent itself is reconfiguring its relationship with Washington's trade posture and Beijing's Belt and Road alternatives. Italy, which hosted the G7 summit in 2024 and maintains deeper institutional ties with both the United States and the European Union than most Mediterranean states, is positioning itself as a bridge partner for New Delhi in a way that France and Germany, with their more institutionalised India–EU frameworks, are not.
What makes the piece culturally resonant is its framing. Rather than leading with trade volumes or defence procurement — the usual currency of summit diplomacy — both leaders foreground shared heritage, philosophical traditions, and what the article calls "civilisational bonds." This is diplomatic language more familiar from Chinese or Turkish foreign policy rhetoric than from Western-aligned capitals. It suggests New Delhi is reaching for a deeper vocabulary of partnership, one that claims legitimacy through history rather than through the transactional arithmetic of trade deficits and investment flows.
The question is whether this cultural framing amounts to a substantive reorientation of India–Italy economic ties, or whether it is primarily a signalling exercise — a way for both governments to signal to domestic audiences that their foreign policies are anchored in something older and more durable than the next quarterly earnings report.
From Summitry to Shared Heritage
The Modi–Meloni op-ed arrives against a backdrop of steadily deepening India–Italy economic engagement. Bilateral trade in goods reached approximately $18.8 billion in the fiscal year ending March 2025, according to Indian customs data, with Italy running a modest surplus. Italian exports to India are concentrated in machinery, chemicals, and automotive components — sectors where Italian industrial expertise is globally competitive. Indian exports to Italy are more diversified, spanning pharmaceuticals, textiles, and refined petroleum products.
What the op-ed adds is a cultural layer on top of this commercial foundation. The article references the legacy of the Italian explorer Marco Polo — an opening that has become something of a diplomatic trope in India–Italy exchanges — as well as more contemporary cultural exchanges in film, cuisine, and academic collaboration. The framing is deliberate: it positions the relationship as one with organic roots rather than one manufactured by trade negotiators in Geneva or Brussels.
For New Delhi, this framing serves a dual purpose. Domestically, it allows the Modi government to present its European outreach as grounded in Indian cultural prestige rather than in the liberal, rules-based vocabulary that the government has grown uncomfortable with in multilateral settings. Internationally, it signals to other European capitals that India is willing to engage with the continent on terms that are less mediated by Brussels — more bilateral, more historical, more direct.
Italy's Gamble on the Indo-Pacific
For Italy, the calculus is equally deliberate. Rome exited the Belt and Road Initiative in late 2023, a move that was widely read in Western capitals as a realignment toward the United States and away from Beijing. That decision created diplomatic space for Italy to deepen ties with China-sceptic partners across the Indo-Pacific. India fits neatly into that portfolio.
Meloni's government has made Indo-Pacific engagement a stated priority of its foreign policy. Italy has a small but growing naval presence in the region — a frigate participated in exercises with the Indian Navy in 2024 — and has sought to position Italian defence manufacturers as alternative suppliers to Russian and Western arms chains that India has traditionally relied on. The cultural framing of the Modi–Meloni op-ed dovetails with this defence and security dialogue, giving it a softer texture that makes it more palatable to Indian public opinion, which remains sensitive to the optics of military partnerships.
The structural context matters here. Italy is not alone among European states pursuing an Indo-Pacific pivot — France, Germany, and the Netherlands have all published Indo-Pacific strategies — but it is among the more assertive in acting on them. The op-ed, by anchoring the relationship in shared culture rather than in the language of strategic competition, may make the partnership easier to sell politically in both capitals.
The Limits of Civilisational Diplomacy
The optimistic reading is that cultural diplomacy creates durable foundations for economic and strategic cooperation — that nations which share a sense of historical resonance are more likely to cooperate when interests diverge. The evidence for this proposition is mixed. India and Italy have not, historically, been close partners. Theggio Monti's government expelled an Italian naval officer in 2012 over a diplomatic incident involving Indian fishermen, an episode that produced significant bilateral friction. That incident was resolved, but it illustrates how quickly even well-rooted cultural goodwill can fracture when concrete interests collide.
More broadly, the civilisational framing that both leaders employ carries risks. When diplomatic relationships are anchored in shared heritage, they tend to be measured against a比较高 standard of cultural affinity — a standard that can just as easily generate disappointment when the practical conduct of diplomacy falls short of the rhetoric. The language of civilisational bonds also tends to elide the very real differences in how India and Italy approach questions of religious freedom, minority rights, and democratic governance — differences that the op-ed does not acknowledge and that could surface unpredictably in bilateral forums.
There is also the question of whether the European Union will accommodate bilateral India–Italy cultural diplomacy or seek to channel it through Brussels-mediated frameworks. The EU has its own India strategy, updated in 2024, which aims to deepen trade, investment, and technology cooperation through multilateral mechanisms. Italy's cultural bilateralism is not necessarily incompatible with the EU framework, but it introduces an alternative channel that Rome may find more agile and New Delhi may find more congenial.
What the Op-Ed Signals
The Modi–Meloni joint article is unlikely to transform India–Italy relations overnight. Bilateral trade will not surge because two leaders wrote about shared heritage; defence procurement decisions will be made on the basis of capability and cost, not civilisational resonance. But the piece signals something more durable: both governments are investing in a relationship that has fewer institutional encumbrances than the India–EU framework, and they are framing it in language that appeals to domestic constituencies in ways that trade statistics cannot.
For New Delhi, the calculus is clear. As the global order fragments along regional and ideological lines, India needs partners across the spectrum — not just the traditional Western alliance structure, but also the Mediterranean rim, the Gulf, Southeast Asia, and Latin America. Italy, as a G7 member with Mediterranean geography and a conservative government that shares New Delhi's scepticism of certain multilateral frameworks, occupies a distinctive niche in that portfolio. The cultural framing gives that niche a warmth that is absent from the standard language of strategic partnership.
Whether that warmth translates into concrete outcomes — investment flows, defence contracts, technology transfers — remains to be seen. The op-ed is a beginning, not a destination. But it is a beginning that both sides appear committed to investing in.
—
This publication covered the Modi–Meloni joint op-ed through its original Indian Express framing, which emphasised civilisational bonds and cultural diplomacy. Western wire services tended to foreground the strategic and defence dimensions of the piece, a framing that reflects institutional habit more than the text's actual emphasis.