Veterans, Value, and the 2027 World Cup: Why Ponting's Kohli and Rohit Take Still Matters
Former Australia captain Ricky Ponting says you never write off players of Virat Kohli and Rohit Sharma's caliber. The numbers from the IPL's richest earners suggest why the game treats its veterans as irreplaceable assets — and what that means for India's 2027 World Cup calculus.
Former Australia captain Ricky Ponting offered a straightforward assessment this week on whether Virat Kohli and Rohit Sharma will feature at the 2027 Cricket World Cup in South Africa and Zimbabwe: you never write them off.
The comment, delivered during an interview published by The Indian Express on 21 May 2026, landed against a backdrop of financial data that tells its own story. Kohli tops the all-time list of highest-paid Indian Premier League players with earnings of Rs 230 crore. Rohit Sharma and MS Dhoni occupy the next two spots on that list, according to a separate report by the same outlet. Three veteran cricketers, collectively approaching their mid-to-late thirties, remain the three most valuable human assets in the world's wealthiest franchise cricket league. That is not a coincidence.
The Economics of Experience
The IPL's salary structure is opaque by design. Player auctions, retention rights, and endorsement portfolios combine in ways that make precise comparisons difficult. But the broad picture is legible: franchises consistently invest retention capital in players past their peak physical years. Kohli, retained by Royal Challengers Bangalore, has not won an IPL title with that franchise. His contract value has not declined accordingly. The league values continuity, marketability, and what team analysts call institutional knowledge — the accumulated pattern-recognition that helps young fast bowlers find their rhythm and senior batsmen navigate pressure overs.
Ponting, who captained Australia across three World Cup campaigns and now coaches Delhi Capitals in the IPL, sits inside this system. His take on Kohli and Rohit is not sentiment. It is the operational judgment of a man who knows what a dressing room loses when experience departs. "You never write them off" is not a hedge. In franchise cricket, it is a commercial observation.
The Age Question and the 2027 Frame
Kohli will turn 38 before the 2027 World Cup begins. Rohit, the current India captain, will be 39. Both have maintained elite international returns into their mid-thirties — a pattern that distinguishes them from most contemporaries. The statistical case for continued selection rests on sustained average and strike rate benchmarks, but the IPL's earnings hierarchy suggests the game's commercial logic operates on a different timeline.
The 2027 World Cup will be hosted entirely in Southern Africa, a condition that introduces a second variable: spin-friendly pitches, altitude, and travel logistics that historically favor senior touring sides with deep experience of subcontinental conditions. India has not played a bilateral series in South Africa since 2021-22. If the selection question turns on fitness and form in the 18 months before the tournament, Kohli and Rohit will answer it with records that still meet selection thresholds. If it turns on succession planning, the BCCI's public position has consistently deferred to performance over age.
The sources do not specify whether either player has publicly committed to playing until 2027. What is public is Ponting's view, and what is financially legible is their continued placement at the top of the IPL's value chain. Those two facts together define the frame.
Franchise cricket and the talent pipeline
One structural point bears noting. The IPL's economic model treats veteran players as anchors for franchise identity. Kohli has been the public face of Royal Challengers Bangalore for over a decade. Dhoni defined Chennai Super Kings' brand for a generation. Rohit's Mumbai Indians captaincy spans six titles. These are not merely on-field assets — they are commercial infrastructure. The financial premium attached to them reflects revenue generation across merchandise, ticket sales, and broadcast viewership that younger players have not yet built.
That commercial logic does not automatically translate to international selection. The Board of Control for Cricket in India manages the national team separately from franchise operations. But the two systems share a labor market. When franchises signal they are not ready to move on from a player, it creates a reference point for selectors considering whether the same player can still perform at World Cup level. Ponting's comment is the coaching world's version of that signal.
What the 2027 Picture Requires
India enters the 2027 cycle with a generation of young internationals who have reshaped the middle order across formats. The sources do not provide data on India's current squad composition or on-field performance metrics for 2024-2026. What is available is the financial record — and that record says the three most valuable players in Indian franchise cricket are all past 34.
The sport does not guarantee continuity. Form declines. Injuries accumulate. But the financial record and the coaching endorsement together suggest that for now, the question of whether Kohli and Rohit play the 2027 World Cup is less about their capacity than about their willingness. Ponting's framing — measured, factual, absent any note of decline — reflects how the game processes veteran athletes. They remain evaluable until they stop performing. The data says they have not stopped.
Monexus framed this as a question of franchise economics and sporting longevity rather than a generational handover narrative, which dominated early coverage of Ponting's comments in the Indian sports press.
