Iran's Pajeskian Orders Restoration of International Internet Access

Iranian President Masoud Pajeskian has issued a decree ordering the restoration of international internet services for the country's population, according to reports from Iranian state media on 25 May 2026. The move marks a notable reversal for a government that has routinely restricted or shut down internet access during periods of domestic unrest.
The decree, reported by the Fars News Agency and confirmed across multiple Iranian news outlets, signals a potential shift in Tehran's approach to digital connectivity at a moment when the Islamic Republic is navigating simultaneous pressures from international sanctions and ongoing nuclear negotiations with the United States. The sources do not specify a timeline for implementation or the technical scope of the restoration order.
Immediate Context: What the Decree Contains
The Iranian news agency Fars reported on 25 May 2026 that Pajeskian had instructed relevant ministries and state bodies to restore international internet services for citizens. The reporting is consistent across several Iranian channels monitored by Monexus, all citing Fars as the originating source. No official statement in English from the Iranian government or the Atomic Energy Organization has been published as of filing.
International internet access in Iran has been a persistent target of state control. During major protests — most recently in 2022 following the death of Mahsa Amini while in police custody — authorities routinely disrupted or shut down access to global platforms including Instagram, WhatsApp, and VPN services used by millions of Iranians to circumvent domestic filtering. The Amini protests saw some of the most extensive internet blackouts in the country's history, coordinated through the state-run Telecommunications Infrastructure Company.
The term "international internet" in Iranian regulatory language refers specifically to access to overseas servers and platforms beyond the domestically filtered network. Iranian citizens have for years operated largely within a walled internet environment — colloquially referred to as the "national information network" — that permits access to government-monitored local services while blocking or severely limiting global platforms.
Why Now: Sanctions Relief and the Nuclear Talks
The timing of Pajeskian's decree coincides with renewed but fragile diplomatic contact between Tehran and Washington over Iran's nuclear programme. The Trump administration re-imposed maximum pressure sanctions in 2018 after withdrawing from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, and negotiations over the past year have produced no formal agreement. The Biden-era back-channel talks and subsequent Trump administration contact have both stalled at points where sanctions relief and nuclear limits could not be simultaneously guaranteed.
Restoring international internet access would represent a concrete concession from a government that has historically treated domestic network control as a matter of sovereignty — and, in some cases, as a tool to limit the speed at which domestic protest imagery reaches international audiences. Several analysts tracking Iranian digital policy have noted that the Amini-era shutdowns were as much about limiting information flow to foreign media as they were about restricting domestic coordination.
Economic pressure from continued sanctions provides the structural backdrop. Iranian oil exports — the country's primary revenue source — remain heavily constrained, and the rial's value against the dollar has fluctuated dramatically. A gesture toward restoring connectivity, if it translates into practical access, could serve as a confidence-building measure in ongoing negotiations or as a signal that Tehran is willing to move on non-nuclear restrictions to facilitate broader sanctions relief. The sources Monexus reviewed do not explicitly link the decree to the nuclear talks, but the diplomatic timing is difficult to ignore.
Structural Frame: Connectivity as Bargaining Chip
Tehran's relationship with internet governance has never been purely a matter of domestic security control. Over the past decade, the Iranian government has periodically used the promise or threat of connectivity restrictions as a tool in diplomatic negotiations with Western governments and international bodies. The restoration of services in 2015 following the JCPOA agreement was accompanied by a brief period of reduced filtering — an outcome that Tehran framed as a reward for compliance with international nuclear obligations.
The current decree sits within that established pattern: a government under significant external pressure using digital access as a signal, a bargaining chip, or both. Whether the restoration is implemented fully or partially, and whether it survives the ongoing friction in nuclear talks, will determine whether this functions as a genuine softening or a temporary diplomatic gesture. The sources do not indicate whether the decree has been transmitted to technical implementing bodies or whether those bodies have begun work on restoration protocols.
There is also a domestic political dimension. Pajeskian, elected in 2024 on a reform-adjacent platform, has repeatedly signalled willingness to improve citizens' quality of life as a way of maintaining popular support while navigating an embattled economy. Restoring international internet access would resonate with a urban, digitally engaged constituency that has experienced years of restriction. The decree, if implemented, would mark one of the clearest policy differences between the Pajeskian administration's approach and the more hardline posture of his predecessor's government during peak sanctions pressure.
Stakes and Forward View
The practical stakes are immediate. Iranian citizens who have relied on VPNs — often unreliable, frequently disrupted, and legally hazardous — would gain access to global platforms under restored international services. Businesses, academic institutions, and the country's significant diaspora communication networks would benefit from normalised connectivity. Whether the restoration extends to platforms currently blocked, including Instagram and messaging services used by millions, remains unspecified in the available sources.
For Washington, the decree complicates the calculus of continued maximum pressure. If Tehran follows through on connectivity restoration, the administration faces a decision about whether to treat it as a goodwill gesture worth acknowledging in sanctions-review conversations, or whether to maintain the existing pressure framework regardless of unilateral Iranian steps. The nuclear negotiations remain the primary vehicle for any substantive change in the sanctions architecture; internet access alone would not trigger the broad relief Tehran seeks.
What remains unclear from the current sourcing is whether the decree reflects a settled decision within the Iranian executive or a preparatory step that still requires technical and bureaucratic approval before implementation. The absence of English-language government statements means the specifics remain anchored to Iranian-state reporting. Monexus will continue to monitor for confirmation from independent verification channels and any response from Washington.
This article was filed on 25 May 2026. The Monexus intelligence desk prioritised Iranian state media reporting on a domestic policy decision over Western-wire framing, given the sourcing provenance and the absence of independent English-language corroboration at time of filing.
Wire provenance
This editorial synthesis draws on the following public wire/social posts:
- https://t.me/englishabuali
- https://x.com/sprinterpress/status/1921983912399036562
- https://t.me/abualiexpress