Brugnaro's Exit Interview: What Venice's departing mayor leaves behind — and what he takes with him
Luigi Brugnaro exits the mayor's office in Venice with the same combative candour that defined his tenure. In an interview published by Corriere della Sera on 26 May 2026, the outgoing mayor discussed his personal choices, his political decisions, and his plans for what comes next — a return, he says, to his companies after years in public office. "I chose Simone but I won't be a 'talking cricket,'" Brugnaro said, referencing a figure from Italian cultural shorthand that implies idle chatter without consequence. "My future? I will finally be able to put my nose back into my companies."
The remarks land at a moment of transition for a city that has spent the better part of a decade navigating flood risks, overtourism, infrastructure decay, and the slow work of reinventing itself as a viable place to live rather than merely a monument to admire. Brugnaro, a construction magnate turned politician, arrived in office with the self-confidence of someone accustomed to building things and getting them done. Whether that disposition served Venice well is a question his successor will inherit.
The mayor who chose Venice — and Simone
Brugnaro first won the mayoralty in 2015, running as an independent with backing from business circles that saw him as a counterweight to the ideological inertia of established parties. His background in construction — he founded the company that bears his name — gave him a reputation for getting infrastructure moving, or at least for claiming credit when it moved on its own. He was re-elected in 2020, navigating the pandemic and the city's ongoing struggle with acqua alta, the seasonal flooding that has grown more severe as sea levels rise.
The interview's personal dimension — his relationship with Simone Venturini — has drawn attention in Italian media as a matter of public record rather than mere gossip. The two have been a visible couple; their appearance together at official events became part of how Venice read its mayor's personal style. Brugnaro's remark that he "chose Simone" suggests finality, or at least a declaration of where his loyalties lie as he steps out of the public eye. Whether this is a genuine reassertion of private life or a calculated signal to allies ahead of political maneuvering is not clear from the available reporting.
What the mayor leaves behind
A transition is also a balance sheet, and the ledger for Brugnaro's mayoralty is mixed. Venice faces structural challenges that no single mayor — and no mayor serving two terms — has fully resolved. Housing costs have pushed long-term residents out of the historic centre; the cruise ship controversy never fully settled; the Mose flood barrier system, completed under his predecessor but operational during his tenure, has been both a relief and a source of maintenance headaches. The city's economy remains heavily dependent on tourism revenue, a vulnerability that the pandemic exposed brutally and that subsequent recovery has not fundamentally restructured.
The available reporting does not provide a comprehensive policy assessment of Brugnaro's achievements and failures — that work belongs to Italian political analysts with longer-form access. What the Corriere della Sera interview offers is a final self-assessment from the man himself: he believes he did what he came to do, and now he is going home to his business. Whether that assessment withstands scrutiny is a separate question.
The 'talking cricket' problem in Italian politics
The phrase "talking cricket" carries cultural weight in Italian. It evokes Pinocchio's conscience — Jiminy Cricket, in the English tradition — but in common usage it often implies someone who talks without acting, someone who offers commentary but not results. Brugnaro's refusal of that label is consistent with how he has presented himself throughout his time in office: a doer, not a discusser.
The self-presentation is politically useful, particularly as Italy's political landscape remains fragmented and many voters express frustration with what they perceive as endless talk and little action. But the frame also obscures the reality that governance is itself a form of action — that the decisions a mayor makes about zoning, procurement, partnerships, and priorities constitute the work, not merely the announcements. Whether Brugnaro's self-assessment reflects genuine accomplishment or a carefully maintained myth is the core question his successor's administration will eventually be measured against.
The next chapter — for Venice and for Brugnaro
Brugnaro's return to his business interests is straightforward on its face: he is a businessman who spent a decade in politics, and he is going back. The structural implication, however, is less simple. Venice is a city where the boundary between public interest and private interest is perpetually contested — where a mayor with a construction company faces obvious questions about procurement decisions, zoning variances, and public-private partnerships. Those questions do not disappear when the mayor leaves office; they calcify into the historical record.
The next mayor will face inherited challenges: housing, tourism management, infrastructure maintenance, climate adaptation. The pattern of Brugnaro's mayoralty — pragmatic, sometimes confrontational, occasionally effective — will be studied by those who follow, not because it was exemplary but because it was recent, and recent governance always becomes the baseline against which the next administration is judged. Whether Venice improves on that baseline will depend on decisions made after the transition is complete.
Brugnaro's departure is, in the end, a routine event — mayors end their terms, and life in city halls continues. But routine transitions in consequential cities are never merely routine. Venice has been changing for decades, and the person who occupies the mayor's office shapes which direction that change takes. The city moves on; the question of what Brugnaro contributed to — or subtracted from — that movement remains open.
This publication's approach: the Italian wire focused on the personal framing and Brugnaro's direct quotes. We foreground the structural legacy — what a departing mayor leaves behind in a city with Venice's particular pressures — and resist the temptation to treat a self-serving exit interview as a final verdict.
Wire provenance
This editorial synthesis draws on the following public wire/social posts:
- https://t.me/CorriereDellaSera/91907af8e0